I, like so many of my betters and wisers,have been saying for months that if the taxpayers are going to bail out the banks, the taxpayers ought to get equity (see, e.g.,
link). I'm still not sure why equity was not part of the first Paulson plan:I suppose it is some confused notion that bailing out debt is
not socialism while taking equity
is. Still, the idea of a $700 billion wet kiss to the richest and best protected has turned out to be a hard sell--it takes a lot of explaining that Paulson et al apparently never thought necessary.
But wait, folks, turns out that we
can take equity--and
could do so all along (
link). Two thoughts:
- Doesn't anybody know how to play this game?
Boring who-the-hell-cares policy note: No, I don't want the government in the business of running banks. But if they (we) are going to take the risk, we ought to get to share in the upside. Preferred is okay with me. Or warrants. And it some not too distant day when the birds all sing again, sell 'em all at an obscene profit.
Tech note: the original of the linked piece is, of course, from Hyperbull Nouriel Roubini who is now saying he wasn't pessimistic enough. I link Kedrosky because it seems you have to register for Roubini to get full access. OTOH, registering is not that hard, and they are giving away a ton of free stuff at the moment, so
give it a look-see.
No comments:
Post a Comment