Showing posts with label cities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cities. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Did I Destroy Cleveland? Not Entirely (An Update)

A few years back I regaled the faithful with my account of how I destroyed Cleveland.  When the news  broke last week about the house of horrors I naturally hightailed it to Google to see if I was responsible.  Answer: not really.  Target zero for the current gruesome story is about three miles away from the unspeakable Area B.  

But I'm not quite sure that's the end of it.  Like, I am sure, almost everybody else, I found myself wondering: what kind of a neighborhood is this, anyway?  Best I can tell, there are some longterm residents.  Isn't there anything by way of community surveillance that might have picked this up?  Slate picks up on the issue, with a different spin, reacting to a commenter in the Plain Dealer:
“At the moment, the hum of criticism on Seymour Avenue is about the subtle signs, such as the lowered shades or odd behavior of Castro and how he never entertained guests,” he writes. “These are the kinds of signs that police officers who patrol a specific beat over time might notice or hear about from neighbors. But that kind of patrol disappeared when community policing ended.”

That kind of patrol disappeared when community policing ended—that’s the line you should remember if you’re looking to criticize the cops here. Intuition is one of a police officer’s foremost assets. But missing persons and odd behavior become suspicious only when you are intimately familiar with a neighborhood, with what normalcy means and when normalcy is breached.
In Cleveland and elsewhere, that sort of hyperlocal knowledge is on the wane.
 Well yes, that's easy to latch onto.  Good morning, Mr. Policeman Brownbear.  Good morning, Johnny--shouldn't you be in school?   We all have that picture in our mind, and it is unfailingly filed under "ancient history."  As it happens, I live in a neighborhood that has all the old prelapsarian good order that you could possibly imagine--and I haven't seen a beat cop here in 30 years (cruiser did stop in my front yard the other evening and rousted an apparent drug suspect; they let him go).

The inference might be that community policing works if and only if there is a community.  So, wasn't there something by way of community on Seymour Avenue to pick up the slack?  In his justly admired backgrounder, Robert L. Smith sketches a response:
This stretch of Seymour Avenue is near the historic heart of Cleveland's Puerto Rican community but it's no bustling barrio. Yards tend to be fenced with rusty chain-link  on a block of long, narrow lots running between West 25th Street and Scranton Road, just south of Interstate 90 and Scranton Cemetery. Several houses, like the one next door to Castro's, are boarded up and abandoned.
Residents say the neighborhood feels safer since police chased away drug dealers a few years ago, but they learned to keep to themselves and to avoid asking too many questions. "Beware of Dog" and "Keep Out" signs are prevalent.

The block is anchored at its eastern end by a stately, red-brick church, Immanuel Lutheran. At the west end, across West 25th street, is the venerable neighborhood bodega, Caribe Grocery, which has been owned for decades by Ariel Castro's uncle, Julio "Cesi" Castro, and which closed after the media descended.
The industrious Castro family has a long history in Cleveland...
 Well--no, not a response, for with all his best efforts,he doesn't seem to be able to put his finger on the question of why the neighborhood is not a barrio, why it is a ghostly cardboard cutout of what you would want it to be.

Boy I wish I had the answer to that one.  I don't, and I'm sure it is above my pay grade.  But I am willing to shake down at least one possible culprit: It's those %$#@! expressways.  Way I read Google, ground zero is tucked into an armpit (I choose my words with care) formed by I-90 and I-71.  Now just about anybody with any on-the-ground knowledge agrees these days that urban freeways are, in retrospect, a dreadful mistake: that they provided no really adequate solution to urban traffic problems and far worse, they tended to suck the lifeblood out of any community that suffered their depredations.

Yes I know, I know, there are a thousand objections.  Some neighborhoods suffered without any expressway in earshot (actually, that would be my in-laws'),.  Some survived the expressway (Really?  Where?).  I can think of any number of other possible causal factors that would have to be plugged into the equation.  

Still, you imagine yourself at 2207 Seymour and you breath in the exhaust fumes and you listen to the hum-thrum of the traffic every hour, every day, every year, and you have to wonder.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

End Radio Silence (also: the Jacobs/Norquist Conundrum)

I'm back.   That is, I've been gone.  You noticed?  No?  Nonetheless, I've been squirreled away for three nights at a business traveler hotel in Portland, where they charge a cheapo off-season rate, with  the same old everyday risible Internet charge.  Which prompted a command decision that the multitudes would just have to do without me for a few day; but it's over.  Now, where was I?

Actually, I have not the slightest notion where I was, but I can report one fascinating puzzle I picked up from my friend David as we searched for a parking place in and around Portland's Hawthorne Boulevard.   David explained that existing zoning laws make way for a fair amount of multi-storey, multi-use construction along the Boulevard, but with no provision for parking?

Say what?  This in one of America's most planning-conscious cities?  Well, yes, but remember the Jane Jacobs principle: if you build it they will come. No, not baseball diamonds, silly, but parking facilities: apparently the good and great decided that if they made it impossible to park, people would ditch their cars.

Yeh, well good luck with that.  Or more precisely: very likely the denizens of this quintessentially Portland  neighborhood do go light on cars and do invest themselves in bikes and Portland's super-convenient (but not cheap) mass transit.  On the other hand, it is likely that all but the most committed have at least one car, even if a Prius. And where do they go?  Hah, you guessed it: into the back streets, where you can so often see people creeping along like predators, only in this case just looking for a place to dump the wheels.

So, not as simple as that.  But then I thought of the foil for honest Jane: Grover ("starve the  beast") Norquist, who famously held that if you cut off the government's allowance.  Conscientious liberals have always thought that Grover's principle doesn't pass the giggle test--but aren't Jane and Grover saying the same thing?   If she is so manifestly right,  can he be obviously wrong?  Or (the horror) could it be that there is some merit in what Grover said after all?

Afterthought:  one corollary of Portland's high bike-to-people ratio--superb, febrile, baroque bike lighting.  You see stuff that glares, glows and blinks from virtually every part of the pedaler's vehicle and even his costume.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Great Cities--Not that Old?

Idle thought: it just struck me that a lot of world-class cities--the kind we think of as having been there forever--are not that old.  Athens, Jerusalem and Rome are old enough, I guess (though Rome may count as a relative latecomer).  Also London.   "New world" cities like New York and Los Angeles--by definition, "new" (so also Sidney, Perth, etc).

But consider Bombay Mumbai. I suppose there were "always" people on those islands, but it didn't really get any traction until 1661, when Charles II got it as a wedding gift: the English/Brits liked it as a trading port. Which explains also Shanghai and Hong Kong, albeit much later. And if the British use tradidng ports to force their way in, recall how Peter the Great created St. Petersburg Leningrad Petrograd St. Petersburg to force his way out.  I suppose there are a hundred more examples that haven't come to mind just yet.

Monday, August 30, 2010

This One's For You, Dave

If projections of population growth come true, Ethiopia may need 20 new cities of 5m people each by 2050.
--Make it Prettier and Cheapter, The Economist, August 26, 2010