Ringtones, we hardly knew ye. The p oint about "social networking," BTW is that the iPhone has broken the barrier between the telephone and the on-line sharing operations. As one who just this month got a Facebook monicker, I suspect this one is way above my paygrade. But it's not about me, anyway.Take, for example, two of the more important drivers in the industry's brave new world: ringtones and social networks. Apple's iPhone stands poised to upend both models.
In a recent conversation with an entertainment lawyer, I remarked what a surprisingly large source of income ringtones has become: $4 billion, $6 billion, $9 billion each year, depending on whose figures you trust.
The lawyer scoffed. Limited shelf life, he responded, no future. Then he added:
"You have the new iPhone, right?"
I nervously fidgeted my Motorola before admitting I wasn't one of the
cool kids.With the iPhone, he patiently explained, it's easy to convert any MP3 into a ringtone. "Talk to any 15-year-old," he advised. I did, well, at least, indirectly. It's happening, I was told. Sure enough, the Web's full of advice on free - and perfectly legal - ringtone creation, using iTunes and the iPhone.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Nothing Lasts Forever: Ringtones
Monday, October 02, 2006
We Still Rule, Maybe
I just popped over to the Food Network to refresh my memory on Alton Brown's unbeatable recipe for roast duck. I find there two ads for:
Duck ringtones? You bet, every chance I get. Oh, no, wait, they are ... selling ... duck ringtones.
You know, in all the fuss over the decline of manufacturing, nobody has ever considered the possibility that we still lead the world in the production of telephone ringtones. And two, yet, so competition thrives.
Afterthought: A friend points out that they are probably all manufactured by underaged Bangladeshi ducks. And it's not competition, it's a two-firm monopoly. (obligatory quacking noise omitted).
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Finally, a Reason for Ringtones
BTW yes, it turns out you can get a ringtone also for "Here Comes the Bride."
Tuesday, September 04, 2007
Manufacturing?
Mrs. Buce does not like to be quizzed, but she puts up with it from time to time as the price of a happy marriage.
Flipping through FP Magazine, I asked:
"I dunno," Mrs. Buce said. "Three?"In 1995, the United States' share of global manufacturing was 22.4 percent. In 2005, its share was --- percent.
Well, fair enough. I too have been inured to believe that our manufacturing output is in catastrophic decline.
But the correct answer, per FP, is 21.1 percent--a drop of less than six percent overall. (see September/October 2007, pps 22 and 94).
But wait, can this be right? Turn the point around--what, if anything, do we manufacture, and who does it? If you read this blog, I suspect that the number of people you know who are "in manufacturing" is about the same as the number who actually fought in Viet Nam.
Automobiles? Sorry. Textiles? Oh, give me a break. Telephone ringtones? Do they count?
After cudgeling our brains, we recalled that we do know two guys in Wisconsin who make false teeth. Seems to me they are carrying a heavy load.
Monday, August 10, 2009
American Exports: A Dose of Reality
Oh, I kid, I kid. Actually, America still exports a lot, including farm products, but also lots of high tech. Here's a good summary (from NSF) of what we still export, and what not: (link). And here are the tables: (link).
For more context here's a piece on import-export activity involving the United States and that poster child of low-rent, low-tech entrepreneurs, Bangladesh (link). Sure enough, exports of textile products (Tee-shirts!) from Bangladesh to the US have been booming. But look at what Bangladesh imports from the US. Textile machinery is on the list, but it's not on top.